top of page

Are You Addicted to Busy? Why Activity Can Feel Like Progress

Writer: Jake Ferrell
Jake Ferrell
Oct 5
6 min read

Every Sunday, my phone gives me a report I usually do not want to see.


Screen Time.


It tells me how many hours I spent staring at the thing, how many times I picked it up, and which apps got most of my attention.


The number is always a little embarrassing.


Because the interesting thing about screen time is that it measures activity, not value.


I can spend three hours on my phone and accomplish almost nothing.


Organizations do the same thing. Meetings. Emails. Slack. Projects. Task lists. Full calendars. Everyone can be extremely busy and still make very little progress. Sometimes busy is not a symptom of productivity. Sometimes we are addicted to it.


Busy Feels Productive

Busy has a way of making us feel useful. A full calendar looks important. A long task list feels productive. A day packed with meetings gives us evidence that something happened. We answered the emails. We attended the meeting.


We updated the spreadsheet. We moved the project card. We checked the box. And there is nothing wrong with any of that. The problem comes when activity becomes the measurement. Because activity and progress are not the same thing.


You can do a lot and move very little.


You can fill an entire week with work and still avoid the one decision that actually matters.


You can have a team working at full capacity on things that are only loosely connected to the outcome.


That is why busy is so seductive.


Busy is easy to prove. Progress is harder.

Activity Gives Us a Quick Win

There is a reason checking something off a list feels good. It is immediate. The task was open. Now it is closed. The email was unanswered. Now it is answered. The meeting was scheduled. Now it happened.


We get a little hit of satisfaction because we can see the completion.


Outcomes are usually slower.


You do not always get immediate proof that the strategy is working.


Growth takes time. Culture takes time. Trust takes time. Changing customer behavior takes time. Building a stronger team takes time. Those things are harder to measure in the moment. So organizations start measuring what they can see.


How many calls did we make? How many campaigns did we launch? How many posts did we publish? How many meetings did we hold? How many tasks did we complete? Those numbers may matter.


But they can also become a substitute for the harder question: Did any of it move the outcome?


Meetings Are Organizational Screen Time

I do not think meetings are bad. Some meetings are incredibly valuable.


But meetings are one of the easiest places for an organization to confuse activity with progress.


You can spend fifteen hours in meetings this week. That tells me almost nothing. Were decisions made? Did ownership become clearer? Were problems solved? Did priorities change? Did someone leave knowing exactly what happens next?


Or did six smart people spend an hour sharing updates everyone could have read in an email?


Meeting time is organizational screen time. The number itself does not tell you whether it was useful. It only tells you where the time went. That distinction matters.


Because an organization can become incredibly efficient at talking about the work instead of doing the work.


Busy Can Become a Hiding Place

This is where it gets uncomfortable. Sometimes we are busy because there is a lot to do.


Sometimes we are busy because it keeps us from doing the hard thing.


The hard thing might be making a decision. Ending a project. Changing a role. Telling someone the truth. Saying no. Choosing one priority over another. Admitting that the strategy is not working.


Killing something we have already invested too much in. Those things are uncomfortable. Activity is easier. So we schedule another meeting. We gather more data. We rewrite the plan. We add another task. We ask for another round of feedback.


We tell ourselves we are being thorough. Maybe we are. Or maybe we are hiding.


Activity gives us the feeling of movement without requiring the discomfort of choosing a direction.


That is one of the most expensive habits an organization can develop.


Your Calendar Is Evidence

A few years ago, I started noticing something about leadership. People are often very clear about what they say matters. Family matters. People matter. Strategy matters. Development matters. Customers matter. Innovation matters. But then you look at the calendar.


And sometimes the calendar tells a different story.


Your calendar is not just a record of your time. It is evidence of your priorities.

The same is true for an organization.


If something is supposedly a major priority but almost no time is being spent on it, that is worth noticing.


If leadership says people development matters, but every meeting is operational, that tells you something.


If innovation matters, but there is no protected time for thinking or experimentation, that tells you something.


If customer experience matters, but nobody is regularly listening to customers, that tells you something.


The calendar tells the truth in a way strategy documents sometimes do not.


The Work Expands to Fill the Space

Organizations are remarkably good at generating work. There will always be another email. Another report. Another meeting. Another request. Another project. Another thing that feels urgent. The work will expand to consume whatever capacity you give it.


That is why execution requires discipline. You cannot simply ask: What needs to get done? There will always be an answer. You have to ask: What matters most right now? Those questions produce very different organizations.


One creates a culture of completion. The other creates a culture of focus. And focus is almost always more uncomfortable. Because focus requires saying no.


More Work Is Not Always the Answer

When results are not moving, leaders often assume the answer is more activity.


Work harder. Move faster. Add another campaign. Create another initiative. Schedule another meeting. Hire another person. Add another tool.


But if the existing work is not connected to the right outcome, more work just creates more noise.


This is why I think one of the best questions a leader can ask is:


What should we stop doing? Not: What else should we add? What else can we launch? What else could we try? What can stop? That question is powerful because capacity is finite. Every yes costs something.


Every meeting takes time from something else. Every new priority competes with an old one. Every new initiative creates another place for attention to go. If everything matters, eventually nothing does.


Execution Is About Movement

Execution is not simply getting things done. It is getting the right things done in a way that moves the strategy forward.

That means activity should always be connected to an outcome. The meeting exists because a decision needs to be made. The campaign exists because behavior needs to change. The project exists because a specific result matters.


The task exists because it advances something larger. When that connection disappears, work starts to become self-sustaining. We do it because we always do it. We meet because the meeting is on the calendar.


We produce the report because someone has always produced the report. We launch the campaign because it is that time of year. Nobody asks whether it still matters. That is how busy cultures are built. Not through laziness.


Through unexamined activity.


The Screen Time Test

If your organization had a Screen Time report, what would it say?


Where did the hours go? How much time was spent in meetings? How much time was spent responding? How much time was spent solving problems that keep coming back? How much time was spent on your actual strategic priorities?


How much time was spent on work that probably should not exist anymore?


That is a useful exercise. Look at the last two weeks. Not the ideal week. The real one. Where did your time go? Where did your team’s time go? Where did leadership attention go?


Then compare that to what you say matters most. The gap between those two things is often revealing.


The Blindspot

The blindspot is assuming that because everyone is busy, the organization must be moving.


It may not be. Busy can hide a lot. Lack of focus. Lack of clarity. Weak ownership. Poor systems. Unnecessary work. Avoided decisions.


And sometimes the hardest thing for a leader to do is stop rewarding visible activity and start demanding meaningful progress.


Not: How much did we do? But: What moved? Not: How full was the week? But: What changed because of it? Not: How many things did we finish? But: Did we advance the outcome that actually matters?


Busy is easy to prove. Progress is harder. But progress is the point.


Is Your Organization Busy—or Actually Moving?

You may not have a productivity problem. You may have a focus problem.


The Blindspot Assessment helps identify where clarity, leadership, execution, or alignment may be keeping your organization busy without moving it forward.


Recent Posts

See All

Comments


Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.
bottom of page